TSTP Solution File: NUM666^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : NUM666^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:56:07 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.17s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (   3 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  114 (  11   ~;   8   |;   0   &;  90   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (  11   ^  20   !;   0   ?;  31   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_22,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(decl_23,type,
    y: nat ).

thf(decl_24,type,
    z: nat ).

thf(decl_25,type,
    some: ( nat > $o ) > $o ).

thf(decl_26,type,
    diffprop: nat > nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_27,type,
    moreis: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_28,type,
    lessis: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(satz16a,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X2 @ X3 )
     => ( ( some
          @ ^ [X5: nat] : ( diffprop @ X4 @ X3 @ X5 ) )
       => ( some
          @ ^ [X5: nat] : ( diffprop @ X4 @ X2 @ X5 ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p',satz16a) ).

thf(m,axiom,
    ( some
    @ ^ [X1: nat] : ( diffprop @ x @ y @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p',m) ).

thf(satz13,axiom,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat] :
      ( ( moreis @ X2 @ X3 )
     => ( lessis @ X3 @ X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p',satz13) ).

thf(satz16d,conjecture,
    ( some
    @ ^ [X1: nat] : ( diffprop @ x @ z @ X1 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p',satz16d) ).

thf(n,axiom,
    moreis @ y @ z,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p',n) ).

thf(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X2: nat,X3: nat,X4: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X2 @ X3 )
     => ( ( some
          @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ X4 @ X3 @ Z0 ) )
       => ( some
          @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ X4 @ X2 @ Z0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[satz16a]) ).

thf(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X11: nat,X12: nat,X13: nat] :
      ( ~ ( lessis @ X11 @ X12 )
      | ~ ( some
          @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ X13 @ X12 @ Z0 ) )
      | ( some
        @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ X13 @ X11 @ Z0 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).

thf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( some
    @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ x @ y @ Z0 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[m]) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X3: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( some @ ( diffprop @ X3 @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( lessis @ X1 @ X2 )
      | ~ ( some @ ( diffprop @ X3 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    some @ ( diffprop @ x @ y ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X14: nat,X15: nat] :
      ( ~ ( moreis @ X14 @ X15 )
      | ( lessis @ X15 @ X14 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[satz13])])]) ).

thf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( some
      @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ x @ z @ Z0 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[satz16d])])]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( some @ ( diffprop @ x @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( lessis @ X1 @ y ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X1: nat,X2: nat] :
      ( ( lessis @ X2 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( moreis @ X1 @ X2 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

thf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( some
      @ ^ [Z0: nat] : ( diffprop @ x @ z @ Z0 ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( some @ ( diffprop @ x @ X1 ) )
      | ~ ( moreis @ y @ X1 ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    moreis @ y @ z,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n]) ).

thf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( some @ ( diffprop @ x @ z ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : NUM666^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.7.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.10/0.31  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.31  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.10/0.31  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 09:50:21 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.42  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.qUTPAo8aaF/E---3.1_32704.p
% 0.17/0.43  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh2lt with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 315 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.43  # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # sh3 with pid 318 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Result found by sh3
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSMNSSN.
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh3 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.43  # Search class: HHUNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
% 0.17/0.43  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.43  # Starting sh3 with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.43  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.17/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.17/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.17/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.17/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 12
% 0.17/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 12
% 0.17/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 3
% 0.17/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.17/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 3
% 0.17/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 7
% 0.17/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 2
% 0.17/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.17/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.17/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 558
% 0.17/0.43  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 80
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.43  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages
% 0.17/0.43  
% 0.17/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.43  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.43  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.17/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
% 0.17/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------